Menu Close

Powering Up in Space: Is Nuclear the Answer?

Speed, energy, and response — these elements determine success and failure in house. Players who need to lead in house should push the envelope, and perhaps even take just a few longshots. At the Defense Innovation Unit, we consider that compact nuclear energy will get us there in house.

On paper, the United States ought to be light-years forward of different nations in nuclear house tech. Six a long time in the past, America launched a nuclear reactor into house (it’s nonetheless up there), and the nation has since spent greater than $15 billion on a dozen authorities applications to develop a nuclear house functionality, and not using a single launch. Meanwhile, Russia is constructing a nuclear house tug, and China has introduced a nuclear system 100 occasions extra highly effective than present U.S. designs. And whereas these claims could oversell the technical actuality, these in the subject should ask: Is the United States nonetheless in the lead?

 

 

Programs presently in the works at the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) and NASA promise to launch fission-powered nuclear thermal propulsion earlier than the finish of the decade. These worthwhile efforts will result in spacecraft with two to 3 occasions extra maneuverability than conventional chemical propellants. Using the nuclear core to warmth hydrogen gasoline, nuclear thermal propulsion permits for responsive in-space maneuvers by sustaining a excessive thrust-to-weight ratio. In addition to nuclear thermal propulsion, NASA can also be researching a fission reactor to energy electric-propulsion techniques (Nuclear Electric Propulsion), which might generate even larger functionality for future missions to Mars and different interplanetary missions.

The downside to those fission reactors is scale, in each measurement and weight. When you embody the gas, moderator, shielding, energy conversion, and radiators, the smallest fission reactor continues to be fairly heavy. As the Department of Defense continues to supply smaller and disaggregated spacecraft, physics is pushing us to seek out various options (that’s, not fission) for nuclear propulsion and energy. While NASA and DARPA are engaged on these conventional nuclear fission approaches, the Defense Innovation Unit is supporting non-traditional and non-fission approaches to nuclear.

As a program supervisor at the Defense Innovation Unit, I’m main the Department of Defense’s effort to construct prototypes of those novel nuclear energy and propulsion techniques for small spacecraft. This work may have a direct affect on how the United States employs spacepower, ushering in an period in which spacecraft maneuver tactically in cislunar house. If the Department of Defense needs starcruiser-like spacecraft earlier than the finish of the decade, America wants a smaller, sooner, and safer method to nuclear. In a quantity practically 2,000 occasions bigger than geostationary orbit, cislunar house requires Department of Defense spacecraft with superior maneuver and energy functionality that might assist implement “norms of behavior” and business actions in this new area.

The excellent news is that commercially developed ideas that will match the invoice exist already — U.S. corporations are spearheading the growth of subsequent technology radioisotopes and compact fusion reactors that might allow large enhancements in maneuverability over present Department of Defense house platforms (e.g. X-37B). Let’s evaluate these nuclear choices, the hurdles they face, and the future they might allow.

Radioisotopes

The method is simple: Radioactive supplies bear nuclear decay, producing warmth that may be transformed into electrical energy. This electrical energy can run spacecraft sensors, communications, and electrical propulsion techniques (e.g., ion drives). Radioisotope energy techniques have been round since the early days of the house age, and plutonium-238, with its constant warmth output and low gamma/neutron emission, continues to be the most popular supply. Despite the expense and shortage, plutonium-238 radioisotope sources proceed to energy experiments and payloads on the moon and Mars.

With a half-life of 88 years, plutonium-238 can produce sustained energy for many years — confirmed by means of its use on the Voyager interstellar probes, that are nonetheless speaking with Earth practically half a century after their launch. However, the main radioisotope energy system is a microwave-sized gadget offering roughly 100 watts {of electrical} energy at considerably low effectivity (round 5 %). At round 2 watts per kilogram, these models are too heavy and produce too little energy to be helpful for propulsion on future Department of Defense satellites the place a lot shorter timelines are at play.

If plutonium is dear, scarce, and lacks obligatory energy density, might shorter half-life radioisotopes be a greater choice? Could higher-performance radioisotope sources feasibly energy each sensor payloads and electrical propulsion techniques?

Cobalt, europium, and strontium may very well be these sources. Policy updates from the White House (e.g., Space Policy Directive-6 and National Security Presidential Memorandum-20) and pending regulatory steerage from the Federal Aviation Administration have opened a pathway for business entities to acquire launch and operational licenses for these radiological supplies. From a launch-safety standpoint, a 100-watt plutonium-238 radioisotope supply is in the similar regulatory class as a 27,000-watt europium supply or a 17,000-watt cobalt supply. These shorter half-life (5 to fifteen years) radioisotopes might obtain vitality density 30 occasions greater than plutonium — as much as a number of hundred watts per kilogram.

One path in the direction of excessive energy (greater than 1,000 watts) radioisotope energy sources is being developed at USNC-Tech, a Seattle-based firm, with funding from NASA, the place the know-how will likely be used to rendezvous with the first identified interstellar object, ‘Oumuamua, presently rushing away from Earth at roughly 30 kilometers per second. Such a staggering energy system wouldn’t solely outperform plutonium-238, but additionally presents energy density at the least 10 occasions greater than a similar-sized fission reactor energy system, and may very well be prepared years earlier than the first fission techniques. Companies growing these new radioisotope energy techniques have their work minimize out — they should work out new irradiation schemes, novel encapsulation strategies, shielding and distant dealing with, and energy conversion challenges, however the payoff may very well be large.

Fusion: No Longer 30 Years Away?

Building a compact fusion reactor in your storage is feasible. The drawback is getting extra vitality out of it than you employ to run it. This ratio of vitality out to vitality in is known as the Q-factor. To date, a fusion reactor with a Q-factor larger than one has not been constructed, though there are dozens of fusion startups, a fledgling business affiliation, and persisting hope that fusion is inside grasp. The closest anybody has come is a Q-factor of 0.33 for five seconds, achieved at the Joint European Tokamak, per a report revealed this yr.

If nuclear fusion is true round the nook, how may fusion reactors be used in house? Let’s check out our choices.

Magnetic Confinement Fusion

The world-record Joint European Tokamak fusion reactor makes use of magnetic coils to restrict scorching plasma in a donut-shaped gadget (tokamak). This method, known as magnetic confinement, has been underneath growth from the very first days of fusion.

Achieving a Q-factor larger than one utilizing magnetic fusion requires large plasma volumes surrounded by cryogenically cooled superconducting electromagnets which are the measurement of buildings. The costliest science experiment in human historical past, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is anticipated to realize a Q-factor of greater than 10, however gained’t be accomplished till 2035. Still, it’s attainable that different magnetic fusion units (e.g., SPARC), making the most of new superconductor supplies, may very well be producing carbon-free terrestrial electrical energy in the coming decade. These, nevertheless, won’t work very effectively in house — a fairly sized spacecraft simply gained’t have the ability to help the tons of of tons of magnets wanted for magnetic confinement fusion. Bottom line: Magnetic confinement fusion will likely be nice for Earth, however too heavy for house.

Inertial Confinement Fusion

Another method to fusion depends on squeezing atoms collectively till they fuse, known as inertial confinement. The United States first efficiently demonstrated inertial confinement nuclear fusion throughout the Operation Greenhouse weapon check in 1951 on the Enewetok atoll in the Pacific. But for our functions, thermonuclear weapons don’t make excellent rockets (each NASA and the U.S. Air Force have tried). With the signing of nuclear test-ban treaties and the creation of the laser in the Sixties, scientists started trying into utilizing photons fairly than nuclear explosions to squeeze hydrogen atoms collectively and attain fusion ignition. This approach has been honed at the Department of Energy’s National Ignition Facility, the place 192 lasers, collectively the measurement of three soccer fields, are centered onto a fusion goal the measurement of a pencil eraser in a robust pulse. In these few nanoseconds, the lasers take up 500 occasions the total vitality manufacturing of the United States — proving that squeezing atoms collectively utilizing gentle is extraordinarily tough. While the physics is shut (the facility reached a Q-factor of 0.7 just lately), engineering a spacecraft to hold the pulsed laser energy infrastructure stays infeasible, or results in designs which are ridiculously massive and costly.

Electrostatic Confinement

Electrostatic confinement is probably the longest-running and most underperforming of the fusion ideas, having acquired little critical consideration since being patented by Philo T. Farnsworth in the Sixties. In electrostatic fusion, electrodes trigger ions to speed up towards a central reactor core quantity the place they collide with different ions and may fuse collectively. This technique presents a fusion gadget that doesn’t require house-sized magnets, lasers, or capacitor banks. An electrostatic fusion reactor can be ultra-lightweight, nevertheless, pure electrostatic fusion units have by no means reached a Q-factor of greater than 1 due to a basic physics restrict: collisions between ions trigger losses in confinement a lot sooner than collisions that result in fusion reactions. Bottom line right here: gentle sufficient to really launch into house, however wants some critical physics breakthrough to beat basic limits.

Hybrid Confinement

What’s changing into clear is {that a} mixture of plasma-confinement approaches will likely be required to construct compact-enough spacecraft propulsion and energy engines. In latest years, billions of {dollars} in non-public capital has poured into these hybrid approaches. Magneto-inertial confinement fusion units (e.g., General Fusion) begin with a low-density magnetized plasma earlier than utilizing a “liner” to compress to fusion ignition situations. Another promising hybrid method includes utilizing the plasma gas itself to generate confining magnetic fields (akin to a self-sustaining smoke ring) whereas slamming these plasmas into one another (as, for instance, Helion is making an attempt to do) to realize fusion ignition. An essential attribute of those new units is that they’re small. Avalanche Energy is presently engaged on a hybrid electrostatic/magnetic confinement idea that might result in a “hand-held” fusion reactor. At these extra compact scales, placing a fusion reactor onto a spacecraft is extra science than fiction. The backside line with hybrid approaches: The physics continues to be much less understood, however a hybrid-confinement fusion reactor may very well be gentle sufficient to launch into house.

So the place are we on the street to placing fusion reactors on Department of Defense spacecraft? Despite all of the challenges of constructing issues for house, there may be one benefit {that a} house fusion reactor has over terrestrial fusion reactors: The bar is excessive for fusion to offer business terrestrial electrical energy (a fusion energy plant might have a Q-factor of over 50 to be worthwhile). However, for spacecraft propulsion and energy, a Q issue of round two might nonetheless be helpful as a result of there are fewer vitality transformation and transportation steps. Such enabling business applied sciences can be extraordinarily useful for Department of Defense spacecraft energy and propulsion in the close to time period — one thing price taking a danger on.

What’s Next?

The Defense Innovation Unit is specializing in two approaches to speed up towards floor and flight-testing prototypes: compact fusion and next-gen radioisotope ideas which are more likely to exceed the efficiency of fission reactor energy techniques for small satellites, with the objective of an orbital prototype demonstration in 2027. This method is just not with out danger, each technical and programmatic: Fusion that generates extra energy than it consumes (a Q-factor of greater than 1) must be demonstrated; manufacturing pathways for high-power radioisotopes ought to be shaped, and, most significantly, each business and the Department of Defense ought to guarantee public security by working hand-in-hand with regulatory and licensing businesses. These are usually not simple duties. In reality, many in the fission, fusion, and house industries will see these approaches as true longshots, however America can’t innovate with out taking dangers on new applied sciences. This is the method.

 

 

Ryan Weed is main the Nuclear Advanced Propulsion and Power program at the Defense Innovation Unit as a program supervisor in the house portfolio. Ryan is a Ph.D. physicist and U.S. Air Force experimental check pilot, logging over 2,000 hours in greater than 30 totally different plane. As a NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts Fellow, he has studied radioisotope positron propulsion techniques. While at Blue Origin, Ryan designed and carried out an Instrumentation Laboratory for cryogenic rocket fuels. As founding father of Positron Dynamics, he has designed and constructed a positron beamline facility, and developed high-specific impulse propulsion ideas.

Image: Wikimedia