Menu Close

Double Asymmetry: The Inevitability of an Arms Race on the Korean Peninsula

On June 6, South Korea and the United States test-fired eight ballistic missiles, a day after North Korea test-fired eight of its personal ballistic missiles, providing a snapshot of an arms race that has been going on for a while. Since 2019, North Korea has resumed testing its missiles, together with intercontinental ballistic missiles it examined earlier this 12 months, lifting its 2017 self-imposed moratorium on nuclear weapons and missile checks. Just throughout the first half of 2022, it has test-fired over 30 missiles, breaking its 2019 report of 25. A seventh nuclear take a look at appears imminent judging from current actions at North Korea’s Punggye-ri nuclear testing web site. After Kim Jong Un defended his acceleration of the arms buildup at a gathering of the Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea final week, North Korea’s provocations will probably proceed. South Korea, for its half, can be accelerating its navy buildup, searching for extra subtle ballistic missiles, together with submarine-launched ballistic missiles and hypersonic cruise missiles, in addition to missile protection methods. The nation’s new president, Yoon Suk-yeol, has vowed to assemble a strong navy.

Driving the arms race on the Korean Peninsula is what I name a “double asymmetry of power”: an asymmetry at each the nuclear and standard ranges. North Korea is enhancing its nuclear and missile capabilities in an effort to safe a survivable nuclear arsenal vis-à-vis the United States. Lacking a nuclear choice, South Korea is searching for to counter North Korea’s nuclear threats with subtle typical capabilities. Lagging far behind South Korea in phrases of typical capabilities, North Korea is searching for to modernize its typical weapons, as properly. Due to the energy imbalance at each the nuclear and standard ranges, and the problem in assessing the energy stability throughout the typical and nuclear domains, neither nation is more likely to really feel assured of its safety, and thus will proceed to reinforce its navy capabilities to discourage the different aspect’s threats.



The North’s March Toward a Survivable Nuclear Arsenal

North Korea is advancing its nuclear and missile capabilities to discourage the United States. It is believed that North Korea has not but acquired the means to launch a nuclear assault in opposition to the United States in mild of North Korea’s 2017 ICBM take a look at that failed on the reentry section. The re-entry car expertise protects a nuclear warhead from the intense warmth and vibrations generated when a long-range missile re-enters the Earth’s ambiance. One of the three missiles North Korea launched on May 25 appears to have been aimed toward testing its re-entry car expertise (this missile had a flight path described as a “double arc” with the missile ascending and descending twice, which can point out a re-entry car breaking off from the missile.) In addition, North Korea wants to reinforce its second-strike functionality: the means to retaliate with nuclear weapons in opposition to a nuclear assault. Its current take a look at of the Hwasong 17 missile could also be aimed toward filling this hole. Much consideration has been paid to the measurement of the Hwasong 17 — it’s the largest ICBM ever developed (therefore the identify, “monster missile”). The measurement issues as a result of the missile can carry a big payload, probably together with a number of re-entry automobiles, which complicates a missile-defense system’s job of capturing down all of them without delay. The proven fact that the missile was examined from a cell launcher makes it much more tough for missile-defense methods to focus on. North Korea’s current testing of a submarine-launched ballistic missile and hypersonic glide automobiles might additionally pose threats to missile-defense methods. All of these are aimed toward enhancing North Korea’s second-strike functionality.

A Nuclear Option for the South?

To counter North Korea’s nuclear threats, South Korea has relied on prolonged deterrence from the American nuclear umbrella. The credibility of prolonged deterrence, nevertheless, has been questioned again and again, and is additional undermined now that North Korea is inching nearer to buying the functionality to launch a nuclear assault in opposition to the United States and securing a second-strike functionality. If North Korea can pose direct nuclear threats to the United States, defending South Korea could turn out to be too expensive for the United States.

Due to this uncertainty, South Korea is methods to develop its personal functionality to counter North Korea’s nuclear threats. The handiest solution to stability nuclear capabilities would of course be to develop its personal such weapons. According to a current Chicago Council survey that my colleagues and I carried out, 71 p.c of South Koreans supported nuclear armament. The public overwhelmingly most popular an impartial arsenal (67 p.c) over internet hosting a deployment of U.S. nuclear weapons (9 p.c). The South Korean public’s help for nuclear weapons, particularly their indigenous growth, is strong.

Of course, we should always distinguish what the public needs from what leaders can do. In actuality, it’s extremely unlikely that Seoul will go nuclear, as a result of the prices outweigh the advantages. Should South Korea determine to develop its personal nuclear weapons, the United States would probably withdraw its safety assure. Although South Korea has superior nuclear applied sciences, it lacks the fissile materials manufacturing functionality, and Seoul would nonetheless want three to 5 years to amass a workable nuclear arsenal. During this era, South Korea could be critically susceptible to North Korea’s nuclear threats. That is to say, in the brief time period, South Korea’s nuclear armament would lower fairly than improve its safety. Also, it’s probably that injury to South Korea’s export-dependent financial system in the type of sanctions could be important. Sanctions in opposition to South Korea imposed by China alone in the wake of the deployment of the American Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system have been extreme sufficient. The prospect of going through large-scale multilateral financial sanctions is more likely to erode help for nuclear armament, when it comes right down to it.

Given the huge safety and financial prices related to nuclear armament, another choice for South Korea is nuclear hedging: sustaining a viable choice for the comparatively speedy acquisition of nuclear weapons however stopping brief of their growth. Though it’s exhausting to show, President Moon Jae-in appears to have pursued such an choice by making ready to construct nuclear-powered submarines, ostensibly to counter North Korea’s submarine-launched ballistic missile functionality. But this might in actual fact have been to amass the means to supply nuclear fissile supplies as gasoline for submarines — gasoline that might later be transformed into nuclear weapons. Combined with the nation’s ballistic missile program, this may make it doable for South Korea to amass a workable nuclear arsenal in brief order.

However, Washington stays in opposition to South Korea’s growth of nuclear-powered submarines. Seoul has been attempting to amass U.S. consent however hasn’t been profitable. The nuclear cooperation settlement between the United States and South Korea prohibits the latter’s use of nuclear expertise for navy functions. As such, nuclear hedging is just not but possible.

South Korea’s Conventional Deterrence: Will This Really Work?

Given the uncertainty of prolonged deterrence and the lack of a viable nuclear choice of its personal, South Korea is, for now, pursuing the so-called three-pronged protection technique of typical deterrence to counter the North’s nuclear threats. It consists of the Kill Chain technique (preemptive strikes in opposition to North Korean nuclear missiles previous to launch), the Korean Aerial Missile Defense system, and the Korean Massive Punishment and Retaliation technique (in essence a decapitation technique aimed toward taking out the North Korean management). Moon described it in watered-down phrases, corresponding to “strategic strike system,” so as to not provoke Pyongyang, however Yoon lately reinstated the authentic names.

In order for typical deterrence to work, it should persuade Pyongyang of the prospect of its success. For that, South Korea wants a bigger and extra succesful arsenal of typical belongings. For Kill Chain, South Korea is growing cruise missiles with excessive precision in addition to intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance belongings that allow detection of North Korea’s nuclear and missile actions. South Korea is enhancing its missile protection capabilities by growing its indigenous belongings in addition to buying extra American ones. For the decapitation technique, South Korea requires ballistic missiles, bunker busters, and high-explosive shells, with which it will possibly strike potential North Korean elites’ hideouts as quickly as Pyongyang demonstrates its intention to make use of a nuclear weapon.

Deterring nuclear use with typical weapons is difficult, nevertheless. The third prong, the decapitation technique, has the greatest likelihood of deterring, though it’s nonetheless not a certain factor. Given that North Korea’s heart of gravity is its management, taking out the nation’s leaders would inflict unacceptable hurt, by which case the logic of deterrence would maintain. Indeed, Pyongyang has taken South Korea’s decapitation technique critically. For a while, it has sought to amass South Korea’s operational plans for decapitation, and simply final month, the South Korean media reported {that a} South Korean military captain transferred half of the plan to a North Korean operative. On the different hand, the effectiveness of Kill Chain is questionable. Even with enhanced surveillance capabilities, detecting and monitoring North Korean missiles is tough given the North’s means to launch missiles from submarines and road-mobile launchers. Even if detection is possible, it might be difficult for Seoul to strike North Korea’s missile launchers and command and management inside a short while body. The utility of missile protection can be doubtful in mild of North Korea’s growth of hypersonic and a number of re-entry automobiles. Hence, understandably, skepticism abounds whether or not Seoul can ever deter nuclear threats with typical weapons.

Nonetheless, Seoul can’t merely rely on America’s prolonged deterrence with out exploring deterrence of its personal. South Korea will probably search to make its typical deterrence as credible as doable, even when it could by no means be really capable of counter threats posed by North Korea’s nuclear arsenal.

Nukes May Not Be Enough: North Korea’s Conventional Modernization

North Korea, for its half, is searching for to reinforce its personal typical capabilities in response to South Korea doing so. Nuclear weapons are usually not a cure-all — they don’t essentially get rid of all safety threats, and standard capabilities are nonetheless essential in countering low-level confrontations. North Korea’s typical capabilities considerably lag behind these of South Korea. Much of its typical weapons are outmoded, and its troopers are malnourished. North Korea’s protection spending is way decrease than South Korea’s. To put issues into perspective, South Korea’s 2020 protection finances was $45.7 billion, about 1.5 occasions North Korea’s whole GDP that 12 months, which was $27.4 billion. Plus, a big portion of North Korea’s protection finances goes into its nuclear and missile packages. Therefore, North Korea is searching for to shut the hole in typical energy. On the seventy fifth anniversary of the founding of the Workers’ Party of Korea in October 2021, North Korea displayed new or up to date typical weapons, together with multiple-launch rocket methods, short-range ballistic missiles, air-defense radar automobiles, anti-tank missiles, and smoke grenade launchers. Still, North Korea has a protracted solution to go to meet up with the South.

Under these circumstances of double asymmetry, a continued, unabated arms race on the Korean Peninsula is a near-certainty. South Korea received’t be assured that its typical weapons will ever be sufficient to discourage North Korea’s nuclear threats, whereas North Korea will proceed to really feel susceptible not solely to the American nuclear umbrella, but additionally to the South’s far superior typical capabilities. Unlike arms races in a single area the place parity will be measured with relative confidence and the adversaries can attain a brand new equilibrium, double asymmetry makes it exhausting for both aspect to really feel assured their navy may may have a deterrent impact on the different. For this motive, the present scenario on the Korean Peninsula could also be arguably much more precarious and chronic than an arms race between nuclear powers.

What does this imply for U.S. coverage? Unfortunately, Washington doesn’t appear to have any good choices to alleviate the pressures at play in the arms race. Denuclearizing North Korea has been tried and failed. At this level, an arms-control take care of North Korea looks like a extra possible purpose, however signing one would make Seoul really feel extra insecure and speed up its navy buildup even additional. Washington can guarantee South Korea of America’s safety assure solely a lot, however not sufficient for Seoul to resign the path ahead to growing autonomous self-defense.



Lami Kim is an assistant professor and director of Asian Studies Program at the U.S. Army War College and a U.S.-Korea NextGen Scholar at Center for Strategic and International Studies. This piece is predicated on her presentation at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. The views expressed are these of the creator and don’t essentially mirror the official coverage of the U.S. authorities. 

Image: U.S. Army picture by Staff Sgt. Sinthia Rosario